By Lee Enochs
In recent years, the controversial subject of global warming and a potential “climate disaster” has received a lot of media attention.
There are some scientists and progressive politicians who are now arguing that unless profound steps are taken to reduce worldwide carbon emissions in order to significantly reduce the earth’s temperature, we face an impending world-wide climate related catastrophe.
Former Presidential aspirant and Vice-President Al Gore was one of the first national personalities to raise the subject of global warming and the potentiality of an impending climate related catastrophe with the release of his Oscar winning documentary, An Inconvenient Truth in 2006.
Needless to say, such dire prognostications have gained the attention of both the scientific and political communities. So important is the issue of global warming, in 2016, many different countries around the world agreed to sign the “Paris Agreement” (French: Accord de Paris), an accord within the United States Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC), pertaining to greenhouse gas-emissions and other climate related issues.
The Paris Agreement’s long-range aspiration is to keep the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels; and to limit the increase to 1.5 °C, since this would substantially reduce the risks and effects of climate change.
However, the Paris Agreement has had its detractors, as evidenced by U.S. President Donald Trump who announced in June 2017, that he would withdraw the United States from the agreement.
In the nation of France itself, the Paris Agreement has been controversial and gave impetus to the “Yellow Vests movement,” a populist grassroots protest movement that saw hundreds of thousands of citizens mobilize against French President Emmanuel Marcon and his government for significantly raising taxes at the pump in an effort to reduce fossil fuel consumption out of concerns related to global warming.
Conversely, many political progressives in the United States have decried and protested President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris Agreement and have argued that the citizens of earth are sitting on a virtual ticking time bomb and have issued dire warnings that we have just a decade to avert an unparalleled catastrophe of unfathomable proportions.
Some of these progressive politicians and purveyors of the “Green New Deal” have argued that unless the United States of America spends trillions of dollars on combating the epic destruction almost certain to come in approximately a decade or a little more, it is almost certain that the world will come to an end due to climate related foods, droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves without parallel in human history.
While, I will not contest that we all need to care about the environment and not unnecessarily pollute the earth, I am concerned with the “gloom and doom” prognostications of some of the people raising the issue of global warming.
I also find it interesting that those who say that there is an impending climate disaster, keep pushing the date further into the future when such a worldwide cataclysm is supposed to take place.
Case in point, Al Gore distributed his documentary AnInconvenient Truth to the American public in 2006. In that film, Gore argued that the world would come to an end ten years due to global warming from the release of that film.
However, that was thirteen years ago. Yet, we now find ourselves in the year 2019 and the global warming apocalypse has not yet taken place.
The progressives keep pushing for higher taxes to combat climate control and keep pushing the date for such an impending climate related catastrophe further and further into the future. As the Steve Miller Band song once said, “Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' into the future.”
The fever pitched alarmism over global warming seen in the contemporary progressive circles appears to be a form of “secular apocalypticism,” that foretells that the eminent destruction of the earth is just right around the corner.
Case in point, progressive superstar Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said recently that she thinks that there is an urgency needed in addressing man-made climate change, warning that it will "destroy the planet" in a dozen years if humans do not address the issue, no matter the cost ( The Hill, “Ocasio-Cortez: 'World will end in 12 years' if climate change not addressed,” January 23, 2019).
However, it appears that all this gloom and doom being conveyed by climate alarmists is a variation of the old “Chicken Little” tale that tells the story of a little chicken who thinks the “sky is falling” when he can’t find the piece of the “sky” that hits him and subsequently earns the town scorn when he warns everyone that the world is coming to an end.
In one version of this story, Chicken Little and his friends are ultimately eaten by a wolf who tells the unsuspecting little chickens to hide out in his lair to wait out the coming “apocalypse.”
While the “chicken little” tale is just a children’s story, there is however, a real “wolf” and a real “rat” in this current global warming scare; those who would try to exploit and gouge the American taxpayer with more taxes predicated upon unsubstantiated prognostications about a coming climate related apocalypse.
I do believe that an apocalypse will ultimately take place one day, but it will be entirely different than the global warming catastrophe warned about my progressive friends. As a Christian who believes in the second coming of Jesus Christ, I believe the end of the world will ultimately take place when Christ returns to judge the world not because our carbon emissions are too high.
Until the real apocalypse takes place, I will reserve skepticism for the global warming version. The progressive view of the end of the world appears to be just another statist and collectivist scam that will tax us more and more and take away our liberty.
--------------
Lee Enochs is a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary and studied political science at Princeton University. He is also the author of, “The Case for Rand Paul.”